Legal Opinion
Taylor v. U.S. Department of Justice
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 18, 2003No. CIV.A.00-2688 RBWPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WALTON, District Judge.
The plaintiff has filed a motion seeking reconsideration of this Court’s rulings as set forth in its Memorandum Opinion dated April 1, 2003, 1 in which it granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff seeks reconsideration of the Court’s ruling pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e), 2 which states that “a party may motion to alter or amend a judgment no later than ten days after entry of that judgment.” A district court properly exercises its discretion under Rule 59(e) when there “is an ‘intervening change of controlling…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Safecard Services, Inc. v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Robert Charles Beck v. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Sarah Kattan, by Her Parents and Next Friends Susan J. Thomas and Joseph Kattan, and Cross-Appellants v. District of Columbia, and Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Barnard v. Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Lightfoot v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Lardner v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Hornbostel v. United States Department of InteriorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Piper v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.