Legal Opinion
Whitaker v. Thompson
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 24, 2002No. CIV.A. 01-1539(GK)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KESSLER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are individuals and companies with a direct financial interest in dietary supplements containing vitamins C and E (“antioxidant vitamins”) as well as a nonprofit therapeutic health organization eom-posed of physician members who sell dietary supplements containing antioxidant vitamins. 1 They bring this, action against Defendants Tommy F. Thompson, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”), in his official capacity; HHS; Bernard A. Schwetz, Acting Principal Deputy Commissioner of the Food and Drug…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- City of Lakewood v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- New York Times Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bellion Spirits, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Alliance for Natural Health US v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Alliance for Natural Health US v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Fleminger, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
- Alliance for Natural Health US v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.