Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Shalala

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 15, 1999No. 98-5043, 98-5084PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SILBERMAN, Circuit Judge:

Marketers of dietary supplements must, before including on their labels a claim characterizing the relationship of the supplement to a disease or health-related condition, submit the claim to the Food and Drug Administration for preapproval. The FDA authorizes a claim only if it finds' “significant scientific agreement” among experts that the claim is supported by the available evidence. Appellants failed to persuade the FDA to authorize four such claims and sought relief in the district court, where their various constitutional and statutory challenges were rejected.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Board of Trustees of State Univ. of NY v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Wine & Spirits Retailers, Inc. v. Rhode IslandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  2. Sierra Club v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
  3. National Ass'n of Manufacturers v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
  4. United States Telecom Ass'n v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
  5. Huawei Tech USA v. FCCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API