People v. Krusick
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Butte County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The defendant was tried and convicted upon an information charging him with the crime of seducing an unmarried female of previously chaste character under the promise of marriage.
Section 268 of the Penal Code, under which the information was filed, provides: “ Every person who, under promise of marriage, seduces and has sexual intercourse with an unmarried female of previous chaste character is ' punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for not more than five years, or by a fine of not more than five thousand dollars, or by both such fine and imprisonment.”
1. In order to convict the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. CarrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- In Re VandiveerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- People v. VotawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- People v. WeinstockNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1912
- Swett v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.