Swett v. Gray
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside County. Lueien Shaw, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.—
The action is for alleged seduction, accomplished by promise of marriage and other inducements. The cause was tried to a jury, and plaintiff had the verdict. Defendant appeals from the judgment on the judgment-roll and statement of the case. There is an appeal by the plaintiff from the order granting a new trial, L. A. No. 1120, which, having been affirmed November 6, 1903, makes it unnecessary to notice the numerous alleged errors of law occurring at the trial, specified in the motion for a new trial.
Defendant interposed a demurrer to the amended complaint which was overruled,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Marshall v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- People v. KrusickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Graham v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Hook v. GeorgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- People v. SamonsetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hirschy v. CoodleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Harned v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Bell v. StaackeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Hirschy v. CoodleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- United States Oil & Land Co. v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915