Legal Opinion

Bedenfield v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided February 12, 2020No. 2:19-cv-02658Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS TANEISHA BEDENFIELD, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 19-2658-SAC UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER The plaintiff Taneisha Bedenfield (“Bedenfield”) has filed an employment discrimination complaint asserting claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”) and two Kansas common-law claims of negligent retention and negligent supervision. The defendant United Parcel Service, Inc. (“UPS”), moves under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) to dismiss Bedenfield’s two…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mayfield v. BethardsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  2. Kansas Judicial Review v. StoutCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  3. Plains Resources, Inc. v. GableSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  4. Schmidt v. HTG, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  5. Hilburn v. Enerpipe Ltd.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API