Legal Opinion

Ammon v. Baron Automotive Group

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided July 10, 2003No. CIV.A. 02-2242-KHVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

VRATIL, District Judge.

Loretta Ammon filed suit against her former employer, The Baron Automotive Group d/b/a Baron BMW, for sexual harassment and discrimination in violation of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress under Kansas state law. This matter comes before the Court on the Motion For Summary Judgment Of The Defendant The Baron Automotive Group (Doc. # 96) filed April 4, 2003. For reasons stated below, the Court sustains defendant’s motion in part.

Summary Judgment Standards

Summary judgment is appropriate…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dolquist v. Heartland PresbyteryDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
  2. Mehus v. Emporia State UniversityDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
  3. Freeman v. Spencer Gifts, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2004
  4. McQueen v. Northrop Grumman Systems CorporationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021
  5. Pritchett v. Western Resources, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API