Legal Opinion

Doe v. Sipper

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 25, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2011-0875PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge.

Plaintiff Jane Doe filed this action on May 10, 2011, seeking damages from an incident in which Defendant William Sipper allegedly raped her. The incident took place on November 12, 2010, while both parties were on a business trip in Washington, D.C. A warrant was subsequently issued for Defendant’s arrest over a year later, and he surrendered to police on March 6, 2012. The criminal action in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia is currently pending grand jury indictment. In the instant Motion, Defendant moves to stay…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. United States v. KordelSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. LY USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  5. Carl D. Wehling and Geraldine D. Wehling v. Columbia Broadcasting SystemCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bush v. SemyenovaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  2. United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu CPA Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  3. Act Now to Stop War and End Racism Coalition v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  4. DeMarb v. IsroffDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2021
  5. Kurd v. Republic of TurkeyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API