Legal Opinion

DeMarb v. Isroff

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided September 17, 2021No. 2:20-cv-00778Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN REBECCA DEMARB, Plaintiff, Case No. 20-cv-778-pp v. JEFFREY ISROFF, and SYMAX, LLC, Defendants. ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY (DKT. NO. 11) On May 22, 2020, the plaintiff, as receiver of UMS Holdings, LLC, filed a complaint against Jeffrey Isroff (the former CEO of UMS Holdings) and Isroff’s holding company, Symax LLC. Dkt. No. 1. The defendants since have filed a motion to stay, citing the likely issuance of criminal charges and the possibility that Isroff may have to choose between defending himself in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Charles H. Keating, Jr. v. Office of Thrift SupervisionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. Little Al, A/K/A Texas Ranger, Etc., Charles Thomas Pollard, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  3. United States v. Certain Real Property, Commonly Known as 6250 Ledge Road, Egg Harbor, Wi, and James Gordon, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  4. Chagolla v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
  5. Doe v. SipperDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API