Legal Opinion
United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu CPA Ltd.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 4, 2013No. Misc. No. 2011-0512PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DEBORAH ANN ROBINSON, United States Magistrate Judge.
Petitioner United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) initiated this miscellaneous action by moving for an order to show cause why Respondent, an accounting firm based in the People’s Republic of China, should not be ordered to comply with an administrative subpoena that Petitioner served on Respondent in connection with an SEC investigation, In the Matter of Longtop Financial Technologies Limited (“Longtop investigation”). 1 See Application for Order to Show Cause and for Order Requiring Compliance…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Belize Social Development Ltd. v. Government of BelizeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- Naegele v. AlbersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Cpa Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013