Legal Opinion

McClellan v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1997No. 96-123PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

This case comes before us upon an order granting Petitioner Carl McClellan’s petition for a writ of review. We agreed to review the district court’s affirmance of McClellan’s conviction in the justice of the peace court on three counts of unlawful subdivision of land.

We affirm.

ISSUES

The issues which were set forth in McClellan’s petition for a writ of review are as follows:

A. Was the evidence sufficient to support the jury verdict?

B. Did the justice of the peace err in failing to allow the defendant to present testimony that he was selling most of his property in one parcel…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. State v. KefferWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Hodges v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  4. McCone v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Urrutia v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Browning v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Willis v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Rouse v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Fosler v. CollinsWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  5. US West Communications, Inc. v. Wyoming Public Service CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API