Legal Opinion

Willis v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 2002No. 01-74PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KITE, Justice.

[11] Franklin Willis was convicted of felony larceny by a bailee under Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-3-402(b) (LexisNexis 2001) for selling three horses which were entrusted to his care. He appeals his judgment and sentence claiming insufficient evidence and certain evi-dentiary errors. Finding no error, we affirm.

ISSUES

[12] Mr. Willis presents the following issues for our review:

I

Whether the evidence was insufficient to show a felonious taking as the appellant had an honest good faith belief that he had right and title to the property(.]

IL

Whether the Appellant was denied his right to a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. WinchenbachCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  3. Broom v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Hodges v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Skinner v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Larkins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Wilde v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Seward v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Lopez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  5. In the Interest of KP v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API