Legal Opinion

Browning v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 2001No. 00-166PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOIGT, Justice.

[¶ 1] In February 2000, appellant, Michael Sean Browning, entered nolo contende-re pleas to aiding and abetting an unlawful clandestine laboratory operation in violation of Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 85-7-1059(a)(i) (Lexis-Nexis 2001), a felony, and possession of a controlled substance (methamphetamine) in violation of Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 85-7-1081(0@(C) (LexisNexis 2001), a misdemeanor. Appellant subsequently filed what the district court characterized as a motion to withdraw the appellant's pleas, which the district court denied. On appeal, appellant contends that Wyo. Stat. Ann. §…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Roberts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Sydney B. Kadwell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  5. United States v. Jonathan Jay PollardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Giles v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Reyna v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Ford v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Fraternal Order of Eagles Sheridan Aerie No. 186, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. ForwoodWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Herrera v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API