Legal Opinion

Gorum v. Mott

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 20, 1948No. 4 Div. 63PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARR, Judge.

Plaintiff below claimed damages for the death of his cow which he alleged the defendant killed by negligently running his truck against the animal. The trial resulted in a verdict for the defendant.

The assignments of error are based on the action of the trial judge in denying appellant’s motion for a new trial and the giving of a written instruction.

As to the last indicated assignment, appellant’s counsel cites no authorities in support thereof, and only a slight reference thereto is made in brief. For this reason we are authorized to consider the matter waived. Supreme Court Rule…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. QuintonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  3. William E. Harden, Inc. v. HardenAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. Sandlin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. Mobile Light & Railway Co. v. DavisAlabama Court of Appeals · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Birmingham Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. SellersAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. MeeksAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Pigford v. BillingsleyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1954
  4. Winn-Dixie Montgomery, Inc. v. RowellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  5. Winn-Dixie Montgomery, Inc. v. RowellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API