Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Meeks
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CARR, Judge.
This is a suit to recover damages for alleged personal injuries. The cause went to the jury on count one of the complaint as amended and an agreement to plead in. short by consent. Judgment was in favor of the plaintiff.
Demurrers to the complaint as amended were overruled.’ We hold that no error can be predicated on this ruling. Jefferson Dairy Co. v. Williams, 215 Ala. 559, 112 So. 125.
The case of Kirkland v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. 233 Ala. 404, 171 So. 735, is not here controlling. In the latter case the Supreme Court had under review a complaint which sought to fix…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Nelson v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Wilson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941
- Pollard v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fagan v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949
- Magic City Bottling Co. v. TolbertAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. MeeksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. MeeksAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. MeeksAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.