Legal Opinion

Pigford v. Billingsley

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided May 18, 1954No. 3 Div. 972PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARR, Presiding Judge.

In the court below, without the aid of a jury, the trial judge entered a judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

Appellant sets out nineteen assignments of error.

Assignments 1 to 4 inclusive are argued collectively. In this aspect, in brief, appellant disposes of his insistences in a five-line sentence, without the citation of any specific authority. The effect of the argument is a mere recitation of the assignments of error. Under these circumstances a review by us is not sufficiently presented. Alsup v. Southern Mfg. Co., 248 Ala. 405, 27 So.2d 781; Stover v. Hill, 208 Ala.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Sweeney v. TritschSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  2. Alabama Power Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  3. Gettings v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
  4. Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  5. Buffalo Rock Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Vasko v. JardineSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  2. Roberts v. City of GenevaDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2000
  3. Amsouth Bank, N.A. v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  4. Pelzer Homes, Inc. v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  5. Moore v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API