Pigford v. Billingsley
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CARR, Presiding Judge.
In the court below, without the aid of a jury, the trial judge entered a judgment in favor of the plaintiff.
Appellant sets out nineteen assignments of error.
Assignments 1 to 4 inclusive are argued collectively. In this aspect, in brief, appellant disposes of his insistences in a five-line sentence, without the citation of any specific authority. The effect of the argument is a mere recitation of the assignments of error. Under these circumstances a review by us is not sufficiently presented. Alsup v. Southern Mfg. Co., 248 Ala. 405, 27 So.2d 781; Stover v. Hill, 208 Ala.…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Sweeney v. TritschSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
- Alabama Power Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Gettings v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
- Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Buffalo Rock Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Vasko v. JardineSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Roberts v. City of GenevaDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2000
- Amsouth Bank, N.A. v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Pelzer Homes, Inc. v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Moore v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1959