Sandlin v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SAMFORD, Judge.
There appears in the record sixty-six written charges signed by the trial judge. Thirty-nine of these are marked given and twenty-seven are marked refused. Many of these charges marked refused are substantially covered in other written charges, and the principles of law, when correctly stated in the remaining charges, were covered in the full, clear, and able charge of the trial judge. Moreover, it does not appear from the record as to whether these charges were requested by the state or the defendant, and therefore cannot be considered as a basis for reversal. Jackson v.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Roan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Weems v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Baker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
- Whatley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. RosotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Ellis v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Strange v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1966
- Gills v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1950
- Lawson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.