Legal Opinion

Ruben Condenser Co. v. Aerovox Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 13, 1935No. 337PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

L. HAND, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiffs sued the defendant in Brooklyn upon patent No. 1,891,207; the defendant counterclaimed upon two patents, Nos. 1,815,768 and 1,789,949. The judge passed a decree holding the plaintiffs’ patent valid and infringed and dismissing the counterclaim. The defendant appealed. We need discuss only the plaintiffs’ patent, because we dispose of the counterclaim on other grounds. All the patents are for improvements in dry electrolytic condensers; the defendant’s are the same as those concerned in a suit brought by it against the Concourse Electric Company and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Glidden Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  2. Aerovox Corp. v. Concourse Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Cable Electric Products, Inc. v. Genmark, Inc., A/K/A Diablo Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  2. Safety Car Heating & Lighting Co. v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  3. Reeves Brothers, Inc., and Cross-Appellee v. U. S. Laminating Corp. And Travis Rauch, and Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  4. Diamond International Corporation v. WalterhoeferDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1968
  5. Himmel Bros. Co. v. Serrick CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API