Legal Opinion

Aerovox Corp. v. Dubilier Condenser Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 15, 1938Published

1Opinion of the Court

MANDELBAUM, District Judge.

This is a consolidated patent infringement suit. The bill of complaint charges the defendants, Cornell-Dubilier Corporation, Dubilier Condenser Corporation and Cornell Electric Manufacturing Co. Inc. with infringement of Georgiev patents 1,-789,949 and 1,815,758. During the trial, the bill of complaint as against the defendant, Cornell Electric Manufacturing Co. Inc., was dismissed with the consent of the plaintiff. The answer of the defendant, CornellDubilier Corporation contains a counterclaim against the plaintiff, charging it with infringement of Patent Reissue…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Coffin v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Ruben Condenser Co. v. Aerovox CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  3. Diamond Patent Co. v. S. E. Carr Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1914
  4. Kittle v. HallU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1887
  5. Aerovox Corp. v. Concourse Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API