Legal Opinion

Rocha v. Hulen

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 17, 1935No. Civ. 5128PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

In this action the plaintiff had judgment only against the defendant Lewis Hulen. The other defendants mentioned in the action do not appear upon this appeal, and for convenience, when we use the words “defendant and appellant”, same will refer only to Lewis Hulen.

The complaint alleges that on or about the thirteenth day of March, 1932, while the defendant Lewis Hulen, was operating an automobile upon the Pacheco Pass highway, at a point about 5½ miles southwest from the city of Los Banos, in the county of Merced, and was at the same time carrying and conveying in said automobile, without her…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Crawford v. FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Bookhart v. Greenlease-Lied Motor Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  3. Evans v. Selma Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Smith v. Fall River Joint Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Sullivan v. RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. McCann v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Prager v. IsrealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Kruzie v. SandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Duncan v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Fiske v. WilkieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API