Legal Opinion

Smith v. Fall River Joint Union High School District

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 28, 1931No. Docket No. 4380PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTLE, J., pro tem.

Respondent, through her guardian ad litem, brought this action to recover damages from appellants on account of injuries received in an automobile collision. The jury awarded her the sum of $15,805. The appeal is taken from the judgment entered upon the verdict.

At the time of the collision respondent was a student residing within the boundaries of appellant High School District, and attending the high school therein. She was temporarily staying with another pupil upon the day of the accident, at a place some distance from the school, and where transportation was regularly…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bond v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Press Publishing Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Crawford v. FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Claremont Country Club v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Brown v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. McCann v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Malloy v. FongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Quintal v. Laurel Grove HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Knutson Ex Rel. Knutson v. LurieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  5. Whitechat v. GuyetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API