Legal Opinion

Escrow Connection v. Haas

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 9, 1987No. E003056PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McDANIEL, J.

—This appeal is from an order after judgment, more particularly a ruling in favor of third party claimants and against plaintiff-judgment creditor in connection with its efforts to levy execution on property believed to be owed by defendant-judgment debtors. There is no dispute on the facts and the legal determination turned on interpretation and application of section 2326 of the California Uniform Commercial Code. In our view, the trial court incorrectly interpreted the section, and so the order appealed from will be reversed with directions.

Operational Facts

In an effort…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Allgeier v. CampisiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  2. Logan Paving Co. v. Massey-Ferguson Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  3. Liebowitz v. VoielloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Valley Media, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2002
  2. Multibank National of Western Massachusetts, N.A. v. State Street Auto Sales, Inc. (In Re State Street Auto Sales, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1988
  3. Fariba v. Dealer Services Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Armor All Products v. Amoco Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Bank of California v. Thornton-Blue Pacific, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API