Legal Opinion
Liebowitz v. Voiello
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 13, 1939No. 44PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge.
The present case presents another variation of the repeated attempts of creditors to secure insulation from financial loss in continuing business dealings with a failing concern. The defendant wanted to deliver flour to the bankrupt concern (or those identified with it) for manufacture into macaroni, distribution, and sale; the legal device resorted to was a consignment contract supposed to create only an agency for the processing of the flour and the sale of the completed product. The device was adjudged successful by the District Court, which directed a defendant’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ludvigh v. American Woolen Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Taylor v. FramCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
- Kemp-Booth Co. v. CalvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Lane v. J. E. Roach's Banda Mexicana Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1911
- In Re KleinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hervey v. AMF Beaird, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
- Koenig Inc. v. Ateco Equipment, Inc. (In Re Ateco Equipment, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- Newhall v. HainesDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1981
- Escrow Connection v. HaasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Robie v. Myers Equipment Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.