Legal Opinion
Holloway v. Howerdd
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided March 28, 1973No. Civ. A. 6396PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM'
MORTON, District Judge.
This ease was instituted as a class action against seven defendants alleging violations of §§ 5, 12 and 17 of the Securities Act of 1933 (hereinafter “the Securities Act”), § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (hereinafter “the Exchange Act”), and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities and Exchange Commission. A nonsuit was taken as to one defendant, no proof was offered as to the lia bility of three others, and therefore Eugene Howerdd, Marion S. Lagerquist, and Tennessee Securities Company are the remaining three defendants. Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Myzel v. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- The Johns Hopkins University v. William E. HuttonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
- Schillner v. H. Vaughan Clarke & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Cady v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
- Murphy v. CadyDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Metge v. BaehlerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Herm v. StaffordCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Metge v. BaehlerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- V. L. Nicholson Co. v. Transcon Investment & Financial Ltd.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1980
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,629 C. L. Holloway Et Ux. v. Eugene HowerddCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.