Legal Opinion

Cady v. Murphy

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided August 15, 1940No. 3570PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAGRUDER, Circuit Judge.

This appeal requires for its disposition an interpretation of § 12(2) of the Securities Act of 1933,1 48 Stat. 74. The challenged judgment for plaintiff-appellee cannot stand if, as the defendants maintain, the liability imposed by § 12(2) applies only to owners of securities, selling their own property as principals.

The plaintiff is a small securities broker and dealer doing business in Portland, Maine, under the name of Clifford J. Murphy Co. For many years he had extensive dealings with the defendants, a firm of stock brokers carrying on a general brokerage business…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CadyDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1939
  2. Peterson v. McManusSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Pinter v. DahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,588 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stephen MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  4. Demarco v. EdensCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  5. Fratt v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API