Schillner v. H. Vaughan Clarke & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SWAN, Circuit Judge.
This action is based upon the provisions of section 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C.A. § 771 which is printed in the margin 1 with immaterial omissions. The plaintiffs are a widow and her daughter, both well advanced in years and lacking experience in financial matters, to whom H. Vaughan Clarke & Company, a stock brokerage house whose main office was in Philadelphia, sold two blocks of common stock, each for 100 shares, in Kinsey Distilling Company. The sales were made at Rome, N. Y., in September 1936 and May 1937, respectively, and for each block of stock the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cady v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
- Murphy v. CadyDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1939
- Independence Shares Corporation v. DeckertCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- Rosenberg v. HanoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Gross v. Independence Shares CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1941
3Cited by76 opinions
- Pinter v. DahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Moore v. Kayport Package Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,588 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stephen MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Metromedia Co. v. FugazyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- The Johns Hopkins University v. William E. HuttonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.