Legal Opinion

Gte Sylvania Incorporated v. Continental T v. Inc., a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 9, 1976No. 71--1705PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before CHAMBERS, BROWNING, DUNIWAY, ELY, HUFSTEDLER, WRIGHT, KILKENNY, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, and SNEED, Circuit Judges.* *982ELY, Circuit Judge:

Pursuant to a jury verdict in a private antitrust action, a judgment and an equitable decree were entered in favor of the appellees (hereinafter, collectively, “Continental”) and against the appellant (hereinafter “Sylvania”). On this appeal by Sylvania, the critical issue is whether the district judge erred in concluding, and instructing the jury accordingly, that, under the supposed rationale of United States v. Arnold, Schwinn & Co., 388 U.S.…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Board of Trade of Chicago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Sherman v. British Leyland Motors, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  3. Response of Carolina, Inc. v. Leasco Response, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  4. Jacobson & Company, Inc. v. Armstrong Cork CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  5. Ernest W. Hahn, Inc. v. Hugh B. Codding, Codding Enterprises v. Ernest W. Hahn, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API