Legal Opinion

Maryatt v. Hubbard

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1949No. 30781PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

During the summer and autumn of 1946, the plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. Roy L. Maryatt, and the defendant, Mrs. Mildred M. Hubbard, were neighbors, residing in Broadmoor, Seattle.

Upon Mrs. Hubbard’s land was a greenhouse, and, -learning through her gardener that Mr. and Mrs. Maryatt desired to purchase a greenhouse for their property, negotiations were opened which resulted in an agreement between the parties that plaintiffs would purchase, and defendant would sell, the latter’s greenhouse for one hundred seventy-five dollars. The agreement was entirely oral, no written memorandum whatever having…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rohrbach v. HammillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  2. Conde v. Dreisam Gold Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1906
  3. Anderson v. National Bank of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Coffman v. FlemingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
  5. Charles R. Ablett Co. v. SencerCity of New York Municipal Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anfinson v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Harry Kaufman v. George Solomon and George Teslovich, Individually and Trading as Solomon& TeslovichCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  3. Hartmeier v. EisemanWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Buffaloe v. HartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API