Danford v. Contract Purchase Corp.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarr, J.
The facts in this case are not in dispute. On. September 12, 1945, Claude Coolman, then the husband of the plaintiff, suffered an accidental fatal injury arising out of and in the course of his employment by defendant Contract Purchase Corporation. His sole dependent was the widow who was awarded compensation at the rate of $19 per week, for 400 weeks, for total dependency in accordance with pertinent provisions of the workmen’s compensation law in force at that time as amended by PA 1943, No 245 (CL 1948, § 412.5 [Stat Ann 1947 Cum Supp §17.155]).
In November, 1947, plaintiff petitioned the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Webster v. Rotary Electric Steel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1948
- Kirchner v. Michigan Sugar Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Samels v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1948
- Webber v. Steiger Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1948
- McMullen v. Gavette Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Miller v. SPRINGS COTTON MILLSSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
- Montgomery County v. LakeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- McAvoy v. H B Sherman Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1977
- McAvoy v. H B Sherman Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1977
- Miller v. SPRINGS COTTON MILLSSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954