Legal Opinion

Miller v. SPRINGS COTTON MILLS

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 15, 1954No. 16860PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oxner, Justice.

• This is an appeal from an order of the Circuit Court reversing an award for compensation made by the Industrial Commission. The major question presented is whether the employee sustained an injury by accident arising out of and in the course of her employment.

• • Claimant was employed in the cloth room of the Eureka Plant of the Springs Cotton Mills. The mill operated a cafeteria in the same building for the convenience of the employees, most of whom ate there," although some brought their food from home. Claimant’s hours of employment were from 6:00 a. m. to 2:00 p. m., with…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. EavesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  2. Manning v. Gossett MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  3. Bannister v. ShepherdSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  4. McDonald v. Palmetto TheatersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  5. Samels v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1948

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bagwell v. Ernest Burwell, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  2. Case v. Hermitage Cotton MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  3. Colvin v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  4. Ellis v. Spartan MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  5. Bagwell v. ERNEST BURWELL, INC.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1955

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API