Legal Opinion

Kirchner v. Michigan Sugar Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1919No. Docket No. 87PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Certiorari to Industrial Accident Board. Theodore Kirchner presented his claim for compensation against the Michigan Sugar Company for injuries received in defendant’s employ. From an order granting a petition of defendant and the State Accident Fund, insurer, for the modification of the award, plaintiff brings certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

Claimant was employed as yard foreman by the Michigan Sugar Company at its factory at Carrollton, Michigan. He was injured. He was earning three dollars a day seven days in the week. The State Accident Fund was the insurer of the Michigan Sugar Company. An agreement for compensation was made between the commissioner of insurance and the claimant, which provided for the payment to claimant, of ten dollars per week during disability. This was approved by the industrial accident board. Accordingly, compensation was paid from date of accident, November 16, 1916, to March 4, 1918, when the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Andrejwski v. Wolverine Coal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. McLean v. Eaton Manfg. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Hughson v. City of KalamazooMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Harrington v. Department of Labor & IndustryMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Kittleson v. HiblerWyoming Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Holmes v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1961

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API