Mitchell Drainage District v. Farmers Irrigation District
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Lightner, District Judge.
Injunction to prevent defendant from permitting the waters from , Wet Spottedtail Draw to pass through its irrigation canal and into plaintiff’s drainage district. The finding was for defendant and plaintiff has appealed.
The appellant will be referred to in this opinion as plaintiff, and the appellees, who are the irrigation district and its officers, as defendant. The controversy pertains to water conditions in and about Mitchell in Scotts Bluff county.
For many years defendant company has intercepted the water from Wet Spottedtail Draw and carried it eastward where…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Smith v. YoumansWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Greisinger v. KlinhardtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
- Kray v. MuggliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Drainage District No. 2 v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Mathewson v. HoffmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Natural Soda Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Manitowoc Remanufacturing, Inc. v. VocqueSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Drainage Board v. Village of HomerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Whitcher v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1935
- Kiwanis Club Foundation, Inc. of Lincoln v. YostNebraska Supreme Court · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.