Whitcher v. State
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.
The case is titled erroneously. The state is not a party. The petitionees are the attorney-general and three individuals owning lots on the shore of North River pond. No title or right claimed by the state need here be adjudicated, and remarks in this opinion relating to any title or right of the state are dicta. The rights involved are solely those of the plaintiff and the three littoral owners who are defendants. The latter have certain private rights as shore owners; in common with others not such owners, they have also certain rights as members of the public. It would seem that the three…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hayden v. StoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Taft v. Bridgeton Worsted Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Fox River Flour & Paper Co. v. KelleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
- Davis v. WinslowSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1863
- Mitchell Drainage District v. Farmers Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wilbour v. GallagherWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- Grinnell v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
- Heston v. OuslerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- Swan Island Club, Inc. v. WhiteDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1953
- Fish v. Homestead Woolen Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.