Kray v. Muggli
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of tbe district court for Stearns county, Searle, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
This was an action to restrain and enjoin defendants from removing or destroying a certain milldam across Sauk river at Cold Springs, in Stearns county. The defendants recovered in the court below, and plaintiff appeals from an order denying a new trial. A former appeal in the case is reported in 77 Minn. 231, 79 N. W. 964, 1026, 1064.
The facts are substantially as follows : In 1856 a dam was built and constructed across Sauk river at Cold Springs, Stearns county, by the Cold Springs Mill Company, which has ever since, except during a short period in 1865, when out of repair, been maintained…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Adams v. Chicago, Burlington & Northern RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Moose v. . CarsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Town of Rensselaer v. LeopoldIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Belknap v. TrimbleNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
- Smith v. YoumansWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Clement v. State Reclamation BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Natural Soda Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Morris v. Covington CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1918
- Marshall Ice Co. v. LaPlantSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Headley v. City of NorthfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.