Legal Opinion

United States v. James E. Mattox, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 8, 1982No. 82-1170PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

A person who had a duty to supply information on a government form contends he may not be convicted of making a false statement if he in fact had relevant information but filled in the letters “N/A” or inserted nothing in a blank space provided for his answers. We conclude that either the insertion of N/A or the knowing failure to supply the information requested is sufficient to permit, although it of course does not require, a jury to conclude that he has made a false statement.

In connection with his receipt of federal workers’ compensation benefits, Mattox was required to file annually CA…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Bronston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. James A. Irwin, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
  4. United States v. Salvador E. PerezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. United States v. Lloyd Calvin RobbinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert E. Ladum Ronald D. Van Vliet Daniel Hong Echols Doyle Ford David C. Grigonis James R. WeaverCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. Tomas MaldonadoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. BoskicCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. Ronald Stancil FreezeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. Harry EllisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API