United States v. James E. Mattox, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
A person who had a duty to supply information on a government form contends he may not be convicted of making a false statement if he in fact had relevant information but filled in the letters “N/A” or inserted nothing in a blank space provided for his answers. We conclude that either the insertion of N/A or the knowing failure to supply the information requested is sufficient to permit, although it of course does not require, a jury to conclude that he has made a false statement.
In connection with his receipt of federal workers’ compensation benefits, Mattox was required to file annually CA…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Bronston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. James A. Irwin, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Salvador E. PerezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Lloyd Calvin RobbinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. Robert E. Ladum Ronald D. Van Vliet Daniel Hong Echols Doyle Ford David C. Grigonis James R. WeaverCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Tomas MaldonadoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. BoskicCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Ronald Stancil FreezeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Harry EllisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.