Legal Opinion
United States v. Ronald Stancil Freeze
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided May 31, 1983No. 82-2463PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RANDALL, Circuit Judge.
The defendant, Ronald Stancil Freeze, claims on appeal that his conviction of^ossesslO'nnDf-marijuanurwnthUnl^ifnro''distribute should..b,e..set,...aside^ — -1) because the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction; and 2) because he was denied effective assistance of counsel at trial. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm, the-•defendant’s conviction without prejudice to his right to pursue his ineffective assistance of counsel claim under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND.
At approximately 9:00 a.m. on September 22,1981, United States…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. Nelson BellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Jose Hector Santos VergaraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Clark N. FischelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- United States v. Efraim Natanel A/K/A Efriam NatanelCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Tommy Ray HigdonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Wallace HooksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Florita Bell Griffin, Terrence Bernard Roberts, Joe Lee WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.