Legal Opinion

United States v. Ohashi Importing Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 26, 1917No. Nos. 1775 and 1784PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 40310.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge

In the case of United States v. Furuya & Co. (7 Ct. Cust. Appls., 495; T. D. 37109), decided herewith, we considered, the subject of crude seaweed and need not here do more than repeat that seaweed, dried, with nothing added to change its character, and packed in tin boxes as a convenient method of getting the product to market, is to be held seaweed, crude and unmanufactured.

*488It is' further contended in these cases that the seaweed here in question is not shown to correspond with that considered in United States v. Furuya & Co., supra. The Board of General Appraisers expressed the opinion…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. FuruyaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ishimitsu v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
  2. Togasaki v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. Mutual Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  4. Nippon Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API