Legal Opinion

Nippon Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 11, 1944No. C. D. 832PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Cline, Judge:

In these suits against the United States, arising at the ports of Los Angeles, Calif., Seattle, Wash., and Portland, Oreg., the plaintiffs claim that the collector erred in classifying certain seaweeds under paragraph 775 of the Tariff Act of 1930' and assessing duty thereon at 35 per centum ad valorem. The plaintiffs’ chief claim is that the merchandise is free of duty under paragraphs 1722 or 1.705, but the protests contain alternative claims at 10 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1540 and at 10 or 20 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1558. The provisions of law…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ishimitsu v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
  2. Togasaki v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. United States v. Buffalo Natural Gas Fuel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Gruyere Cheese Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  5. Kraft Phenix Cheese Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mutual Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API