Witcombe, McGeachin & Co. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Martin, Presiding Judge,
delivered tbe opinion of tbe court:
Tbe merchandise now upon appeal consists of designs in water colors on paper, intended to serve as models in tbe printing of wall paper and cretonnes in tbis country. They represent leaves, flowers, and similar objects, in more or less natural shapes and colors.
The collector assessed tbe merchandise with duty at the rate of 25 per cent ad valorem under tbe enumeration of manufactures of paper, in paragraph 332 of tbe tariff act of 1913.. The importers protested, claiming free entry under the provisions in paragraph 652 of tbe act for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. OlivottiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
- American Colortype Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. SchadeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946
- A. Millner Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
- United States v. Fung Chong Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946