Commonwealth v. Brazelton
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtNolan, J.
The sole issue in this appeal of the Commonwealth from the allowance of a motion to dismiss is whether, under the United States Constitution or the Massachusetts Constitution, an arrested person has a due process right to counsel prior to deciding whether to take a breathalyzer test. Admittedly, there is no statutory right. We hold that there is no such constitutional right.
The defendant was arrested on June 13, 1987, for operating under the influence of intoxicating liquor and taken to the police station. From the judge’s findings of fact in connection with the defendant’s motion to dismiss,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. NewtonOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. SpencerOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. GurseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Nyflot v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- State of Iowa v. John Arthur Senn Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2016
- Commonwealth v. MencoboniMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
- Commonwealth v. Neary-FrenchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
- Commonwealth v. MaddenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.