Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Neary-French

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided August 15, 2016No. SJC 12057PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpina, J.

In Commonwealth v. Brazelton, 404 Mass. 783, 785 (1989), this court held that there is no right to counsel under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution or art. 12 of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights before a defendant decides whether to take a breathalyzer test. In this case, we are asked to revisit our holding in Brazelton in light of the 2003 amendments made to G. L. c. 90, § 24, the statute establishing the offense of driving while under the influence of intoxi- eating liquor. 2 Prior to the 2003 amendments, G. L. c. 90, § 24, included a permissible…

2Cases cited78 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Caraballo-NievesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2026
  2. Commonwealth v. DonovanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2026
  3. Commonwealth v. ScottMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2020
  4. Commonwealth v. WattMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API