United States v. Halpin
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1Opinion of the Court
Judge STUCKY
delivered the opinion of the Court.
We granted review to consider three questions surrounding trial counsel’s sentencing argument: (1) whether the argument constituted prosecutorial misconduct; (2) whether the military judge erred in failing to stop the argument and issue a curative instruction; *478and (3) whether the defense counsel rendered ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to object to the argument. We hold that Appellant has not met his burden of showing that he was prejudiced by trial counsel’s arguments. We therefore affirm the decision of the United States Air Force…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. BaerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
- United States v. EricksonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
- United States v. FletcherCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
- United States v. MarshCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2011
3Cited by49 opinions
- United States v. AkbarCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
- United States v. FreyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2014
- United States v. SewellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
- United States v. PabelonaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
- United States v. Chief Warrant Officer Four ELMER F. HOFFMAN, IIIArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.