Legal Opinion

Alabama Gold Life Insurance v. Nichols

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 19, 1883PublishedCited by 14 opinions

IN .ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. Motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Waite

In this case a verdict was rendered against the .plaintiff in error for $6,610, and a judgment. entered thereon December 9th, 1819. In the verdict was included, for. damages $600, attorney’s fees $500, and interest $510, in all $1,610; The next day, December 10th, 1819, the defendants in error appeared in open court and “entered a remittitur” of these-amounts, “leaving the amount of said judgment to be for the amount of five thousand dollars and costs of suit.” Upon this being done a new judgment was entered “ that the plaintiffs have and recover from said defendant the sum of five thousand…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thompson v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Simms v. SimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Ex parte SweeneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Pacific Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Brady v. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
  5. First Nat. Bank of Omaha v. RedickSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API