Legal Opinion

Brady v. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 13, 1933No. 6323PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORMAN, Circuit Judge.

The appellant filed suit in the state court in Kentucky as beneficiary of a $15,000 accident insurance policy issued by the appellee. The appellee removed the ease to the federal court on the ground of diversity of citizenship. There it could avail itself of a provision of the policy requiring suit to be brought within two years from the expiration of the time within which proofs of loss were to be made. Riddlesbarger v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co., 7 Wall. 386, 19 L. Ed. 257. The Kentucky courts hold such a clause void as against public policy. Union Central Life Ins.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Railroad Company v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Wecker v. National Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Riddlesbarger v. Hartford InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  5. Iowa Central Railway Co. v. BaconSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rose v. GiamattiDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1989
  2. Cofer v. Horsehead Research & Development Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1991
  3. Erwin v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1965
  4. Yanakeff v. SIGNATURE XVDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1993
  5. Sponholz v. StanislausDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API