Legal Opinion

Pacific Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. O'Connor

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 19, 1888No. 1282PublishedCited by 14 opinions

error to the circuit court of the united states for the NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction.. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Fuller

This was an action to recover damages for personal injuries, which resulted, August 29th, 1888, in a. verdict for $5500. Upon the return of the verdict the court directed, as minuted ■ by the - clerk, judgment to be entered thereon. On the 30th day of August the plaintiff below, by his counsel, asked leave , in open court to remit the. sum of $500,- which was granted, and judgment rendered for $5000 and costs, “and-now so appears of record.”

• Subsequently the defendant below moved to set aside the allowance of the remittitur and to correct the judgment, which motion was denied by the court,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thompson v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Alabama Gold Life Insurance v. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. First Nat. Bank of Omaha v. RedickSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Simms v. SimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GriffithSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Sloss-sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Northern Pacific Railroad v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Pacific Express Co. v. MalinSupreme Court of the United States · 1889

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API