Legal Opinion
Landess v. Schmidt
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided September 26, 1983No. 82-2227PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWedemeyer, P.J.
Edgar Landess (Landess) appeals from a judgment of the trial court granting respondents’ motion to dismiss. Landess claims that *189neither res judicata nor collateral estoppel is applicable to his conspiracy claim under sec. 134.01, Stats. We hold that res judicata bars Landess’ conspiracy claim against the respondents, Borden, Inc. (Borden) and its employees, John Schmidt, Larry Nicosen and Neal Rosinsky (collectively referred to as “employees”), and that collateral estoppel bars the conspiracy claim against the respondents, Janice Gundrum, Howard Gundrum and John W. Hansen (collectively…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Wangen v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- DePratt v. West Bend Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- State Ex Rel. Flowers v. Department of Health & Social ServicesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Arsand v. City of FranklinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Radue v. DillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Northern States Power Co. v. BugherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Estate of Rille Ex Rel. Rille v. Physicians Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- John A. Pliska and Stanley T. Pliska v. City of Stevens Point, Wisconsin and James BenzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Crowall v. Heritage Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
- Wickenhauser v. LehtinenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.