Legal Opinion

John A. Pliska and Stanley T. Pliska v. City of Stevens Point, Wisconsin and James Benz

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 14, 1987No. 86-2360PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUER, Chief Judge.

The plaintiffs, John and Stanley Pliska, brought this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action challenging two City of Stevens Point, Wisconsin (“Stevens Point” or “the City”) ordinances as unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. In addition, John Pliska sought damages for an allegedly illegal stop and arrest. The district court held that the constitutional challenges to the ordinances were barred by the doctrine of res judicata and granted summary judgment for the City. A jury found in favor of the police officer on the illegal stop and arrest claims. We affirm.

I

John Pliska and his father,…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. United States v. Spencer Ray TilmonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  2. Northern States Power Co. v. BugherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  3. United States v. Thomas Stanley WerkingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Robert Earl SandersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  5. T.W. And M.W., Minors, by Their Next Friend, Scott Enk v. Thomas BrophyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API