Legal Opinion
Radue v. Dill
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided November 3, 1976No. 75-21PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.
The sole issue presented on this appeal is whether the complaint sets forth a cause of action.
In Wisconsin civil conspiracy has been defined as a combination of two or more persons by some concerted action to accomplish some unlawful purpose or to accomplish by unlawful means some purpose not in itself unlawful. Mendelson v. Blatz Brewing Co. (1960), 9 Wis. 2d 487, 490, 101 N.W.2d 805. The law of civil conspiracy is further characterized in this state by the following:
“It is the established law of this state that there is no such thing as a civil action for conspiracy. There is an action for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State ex rel. Durner v. HueginWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Mendelson v. Blatz Brewing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Martens v. ReillyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- W. G. Platts, Inc. v. PlattsWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Schultz v. StraussWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Daniel Virnich v. Jeffrey VorwaldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Collins v. Eli Lilly & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Brown v. Birman Managed Care, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- Segall v. HurwitzCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
- Onderdonk v. LambWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.