Legal Opinion

Wickenhauser v. Lehtinen

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 2007No. 2004AP2681PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPatience Drake Roggensack, J.

¶ 1. This is a review of an unpublished per curiam decision of the court of appeals that reversed the circuit court's judg*48ment1 awarding Steven and Christy Wickenhauser (the Wickenhausers) compensatory and punitive damages and denying Jack Lehtinen's (Lehtinen) motions for summary judgment based on claim preclusion. The court of appeals reasoned that since the Wickenhausers obtained rescission of an option to purchase 300 acres of their property in a prior action, they were barred by the election of remedies doctrine from obtaining damages in this action. Wickenhauser v. Lehtinen, No.…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Huron Tool and Engineering Co. v. Precision Consulting Services, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Kaloti Enterprises, Inc. v. Kellogg Sales Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Northern States Power Co. v. BugherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  4. DePratt v. West Bend Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Lindas v. CadyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Five Star Capital Corp. v. RubyNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Arthur Glick Truck Sales, Inc. v. Stuphen East Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  3. BERNER CHEESE CORPORATION v. KrugWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  4. John Teske v. Wilson Mutual Insurance CompanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Below v. NortonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API