Legal Opinion
Odell v. Frueh
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 3, 1956No. Civ. 21749PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
Defendant appeals a judgment imposing liability for breach of warranty.
Appellant E. R. Frueh is the owner of a business conducted under the firm name of Alkali Neutralizer Company which manufactures, sells and applies an anti-alkaloid known as the ‘‘ Ashford Formula ” or “ Ashford Process. ” A. Franklin Frueh, husband of appellant, is the person actively engaged in the conduct of the business. Respondents are partners doing business under the name of Odell Construction Company.
The Glendale Unified School District was planning to construct a building for an elementary school by means of what…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Burr v. Sherwin Williams Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Mary Pickford Co. v. Bayly Bros., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Grupe v. GlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- United States Pipe & Foundry Co. v. City of WacoTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- United States Pipe & Foundry Co. v. City of WacoTexas Supreme Court · 1937
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Barth v. B. F. Goodrich Tire Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- St. Joseph Hospital v. Corbetta Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1974
- Agricultural Services Association, Incorporated v. Ferry-Morse Seed Company, Incorporated, and Waldo Rohnert Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Grinnell v. Charles Pfizer & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Viggiano v. Hansen Natural Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2013
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.